Consistent Bootstrapping
Consistent bootstrapping is the bootstrapping procedure applied to models estimated with the consistent PLS-SEM (PLSc-SEM) algorithm rather than the standard PLS-SEM algorithm. Like standard bootstrapping, it is a nonparametric procedure that allows researchers to test the statistical significance of results such as path coefficients, Cronbach's alpha, HTMT, and R² values. Researchers use consistent bootstrapping when their model has been estimated with PLSc-SEM and they need significance tests, standard errors, or confidence intervals for the PLSc-SEM parameter estimates.
How Consistent Bootstrapping Works
Consistent bootstrapping follows the same resampling logic as standard bootstrapping: subsamples are drawn at random (with replacement) from the original data set, and the model is re-estimated on each subsample. The key difference is that every subsample is estimated using the consistent PLS-SEM (PLSc-SEM) algorithm instead of the standard PLS-SEM algorithm, so the resulting standard errors, t-values, and confidence intervals reflect the disattenuated, factor-consistent parameter estimates that PLSc-SEM produces.
In SmartPLS
In SmartPLS, consistent bootstrapping is available whenever a model uses the PLSc-SEM algorithm. It provides the same significance-testing settings as standard bootstrapping (e.g., number of subsamples, confidence interval method, test type, significance level, and random number generator seed), applied on top of the PLSc-SEM estimation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between bootstrapping and consistent bootstrapping?
Bootstrapping tests the significance of results from the standard PLS-SEM algorithm. Consistent bootstrapping applies the same nonparametric resampling logic, but each subsample is estimated with the consistent PLS-SEM (PLSc-SEM) algorithm, so it is used for significance testing in PLSc-SEM models.
When should I use consistent bootstrapping instead of standard bootstrapping?
Use consistent bootstrapping when your model has been estimated with PLSc-SEM. Since PLSc-SEM produces different (factor-consistent) parameter estimates than standard PLS-SEM, its significance tests should also be derived from PLSc-SEM re-estimations rather than standard PLS-SEM bootstrapping.
Which results can consistent bootstrapping test for significance?
Like standard bootstrapping, consistent bootstrapping can be used to test the statistical significance of results such as path coefficients, Cronbach's alpha, HTMT, and R² values, based on the PLSc-SEM estimates.
Related SmartPLS Methods
- Bootstrapping
- Consistent PLS-SEM (PLSc-SEM)
- Consistent permutation
- Consistent multigroup analysis (MGA)
- Result color thresholds
References
Cite correctly
Please always cite the use of SmartPLS!
Ringle, Christian M., Wende, Sven, & Becker, Jan-Michael. (2024). SmartPLS 4. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com

